OUR UNCONVENTIONAL SOLUTION TO AIR DEFENCE

---

1. You wish to intercept the aircraft kinetically, without destroying it (preserving it for forward intellligence collection.) 

2. You wish to intercept the aircraft in a high collateral zone (e.g over a city, where use of explosives or fragmentation warheads are not viable nor safe at low altitude over urban areas/airports.) 

3. You wish to effect the target, but have intercept/track data that is INSUFFICIENT for conventional intercept (e.g with high volumes of swarm aircraft, or stealth aircraft within a 'zone of uncertainty.' 

4. You wish to strategically block airspace, or have a specific effect on any targets that enter a certain area of airspace. 

5. You wish to enhance target signature to gain sufficient tracking data for conventional intercept. 

Dependent upon substance: 

• Adhesion, usually around 250 milliseconds 
• Signature Enhancement Effects (radar), around 2 seconds
• Mechanical Jamming and Effective Expansion, around 2 seconds

Given we're dealing with finely tuned chemicals, these can be adjusted. 

They are deployed from a 'deployment platform,' such as a missile, one way aerial effector, or other interceptor.

So far, we utilise 2 distinct mechanisms to expel Gel-Adhesives from hermetically sealed containers, each with a differing warhead: 

1. Directed: Using a directional nozzle to maximise Gel-Adhesive concentration and volume-on-target. Fired directly at a targeted aircraft

2. Dispersed: Using specialised aerosolisation micro-vents and expulsion to create a 'gel-adhesive wall' off aersolised particles over a large area of airspace. 

Both deployment mechanisms do NOT use explosives, but instead rapid-gas generation (similar to an airbag,) reducing export control.